Tactical RerollTactical RerollTrust the math. Bless your dice.
⋯

Commander Shadowsun

Epic Hero · 100 pts
Lists17% · in 38 of 226 public lists, September – November 2026
SimulateCommander Shadowsun against any unit, in the calculator

SWORD: what Commander Shadowsun kills

Damage for its points

47SWORD
per 100 pts

Its 100 pts kill ~53 pts in one activation.Typical shooter: 45 per 100

Into each enemy type

Whole meta47SWORD per 100 pts
Hordes49SWORD per 100 pts
Line inf.50SWORD per 100 pts
Heavy inf.46SWORD per 100 pts
Light veh. ★53SWORD per 100 pts
Heavy veh.47SWORD per 100 pts

SHIELD: how hard Commander Shadowsun is to kill for its points

Toughness for its points

155SHIELD
per 100 pts

It takes about 7% of a top army's turn to remove 100 pts of it. To remove all 100 pts: about 236 pts of enemy units, 4 times in 5.Typical shooter: 301 per 100

For its points155SHIELD per 100 pts

What creators say

5 creators
  • A lone operative with a useful re-roll aura 2 of 5
  • Seen in the Experimental Prototype lists 2 of 5
  • Dies fast under fire 1 of 5
  • Command point refund is unreliable 1 of 5

Units near it

Per 100 pts, its nearest in T'au Empire and across the game

SWORD

Across the game· shooters

Land Speeder Space Marines · just ahead48
Commander Shadowsun 47
Ballistus Dreadnought Space Marines · level with it47

SHIELD

Across the game· shooters

Corsair Voidreavers Aeldari · just ahead158
Commander Shadowsun 155
Dark Reapers Aeldari · level with it155

How we got these numbers

Retaliation CadreDatasheet weaponsNo leaderNo stratagems

SWORD 47 · 100 pts kill ~53 pts in one activation

SHIELD 155 · about 7% of a top army's turn to remove 100 pts of it

To remove it: about 236 pts of enemy units, 4 times in 5

Ranked among the game's 403 shooters · How we score ›

What we ran
  • Commander Shadowsun, 100 pts
  • Its datasheet's weapons
  • Counted as dice: its own abilities, the army rule and the detachment's rule
  • Not counted: leaders, stratagems, other units' auras
The letter: 5 creators
The lists: 226